fmri toolbox gift software Search Results


ica fmri toolbox software  (SourceForge net)
90
SourceForge net ica fmri toolbox software
Ica Fmri Toolbox Software, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ica fmri toolbox software/product/SourceForge net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ica fmri toolbox software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fmrib software library fsl v6 0  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc fmrib software library fsl v6 0
Fmrib Software Library Fsl V6 0, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fmrib software library fsl v6 0/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fmrib software library fsl v6 0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fmri toolbox gift matlab software  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc fmri toolbox gift matlab software
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Fmri Toolbox Gift Matlab Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fmri toolbox gift matlab software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fmri toolbox gift matlab software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
neuromark_fmri_1.0 template  (NeuroMark Genomics Inc)
90
NeuroMark Genomics Inc neuromark_fmri_1.0 template
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Neuromark Fmri 1.0 Template, supplied by NeuroMark Genomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/neuromark_fmri_1.0 template/product/NeuroMark Genomics Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
neuromark_fmri_1.0 template - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gift software  (SourceForge net)
90
SourceForge net gift software
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Gift Software, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gift software/product/SourceForge net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gift software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
dparsf toolbox  (SourceForge net)
90
SourceForge net dparsf toolbox
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Dparsf Toolbox, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dparsf toolbox/product/SourceForge net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dparsf toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
statistical parametric mapping 12 toolbox  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc statistical parametric mapping 12 toolbox
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Statistical Parametric Mapping 12 Toolbox, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/statistical parametric mapping 12 toolbox/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
statistical parametric mapping 12 toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
rest toolbox rest 1.7  (SourceForge net)
90
SourceForge net rest toolbox rest 1.7
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Rest Toolbox Rest 1.7, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rest toolbox rest 1.7/product/SourceForge net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rest toolbox rest 1.7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
giftv4.0 software (ica in the fmri toolbox)  (SourceForge net)
90
SourceForge net giftv4.0 software (ica in the fmri toolbox)
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Giftv4.0 Software (Ica In The Fmri Toolbox), supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/giftv4.0 software (ica in the fmri toolbox)/product/SourceForge net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
giftv4.0 software (ica in the fmri toolbox) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fmri toolbox (gift)  (NeuroMark Genomics Inc)
90
NeuroMark Genomics Inc fmri toolbox (gift)
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Fmri Toolbox (Gift), supplied by NeuroMark Genomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fmri toolbox (gift)/product/NeuroMark Genomics Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fmri toolbox (gift) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
ica of fmri toolbox (gift)  (InfoMax Inc)
90
InfoMax Inc ica of fmri toolbox (gift)
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Ica Of Fmri Toolbox (Gift), supplied by InfoMax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ica of fmri toolbox (gift)/product/InfoMax Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ica of fmri toolbox (gift) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gift software  (InfoMax Inc)
90
InfoMax Inc gift software
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Gift Software, supplied by InfoMax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gift software/product/InfoMax Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gift software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: BOLD-fMRI scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.

Journal: Epilepsia open

Article Title: Intrinsic brain network stability during kainic acid-induced epileptogenesis.

doi: 10.1002/epi4.70002

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: BOLD-fMRI scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.

Article Snippet: 2.3.1 | Identification of main network (MN) using group ICA Group- level BOLD- fMRI data were analyzed using GICA in the Group ICA of FMRI Toolbox (GIFT) Matlab software to identify MNs during brain resting state.29 This involved setting 20 independent components (ICs), conducting a two- step principal component analysis (PCA) reduction, and using the Infomax algorithm with ICASSO for component analysis.30 After ICA decomposition, F I G U R E 1 Research flowchart of our proposed study. nloaded from https://onlinelibrary.w iley.com /doi/10.1002/epi4.70002 by IN A SP - N E PA L , W iley O nline L ibrary on [25/02/2025].

Techniques: Control